Why the Wall Street Journal ‘Runners Suck’ Op-Ed Might Be a Little Right

The Wall Street Journal ran an op-ed on Tuesday called “OK, You’re a Runner. Get Over It.” If you’re reading this blog, chances are you saw it, so I’m mostly just explaining this for my mom. You probably saw it, because for some reason every runner on the internet got really upset about it and felt the need to say this on the internet.

It’s as if these people have never read The Wall Street Journal before.

If you didn’t read it, the summary is: there are a lot of people who run and they talk about it and they put stickers on their cars and they buy running stuff and post on Facebook about their runs and this guy thinks they’re just doing it for the attention and he is sick of it.

For someone who gets angry about a lot of things, I did not get angry about this. I mostly didn’t care, not even a little. But, then people started writing responses — Mario had a nice one about welcoming the writer to try running and the Runner’s World “translation” was the funniest, but their’s were not the only ones — and it went all viral-y and then I started to care. Because most of the responses went all running mysticism and waxed eloquent about how running’s not about the attention, it’s about something more, etc. They surmised that runners are deeper, wiser beings looking for answers inside themselves, who are not driven by cheap things like pride and attention.

Yeah, I’m calling bullshit.

Here’s the thing:

If “running” is not about people liking you and congratulating you and extolling your amazingness as a runner/athlete, then why do you care that someone isn’t. If running is really about your own journey, then why is this op-ed so upsetting.

It’s upsetting because, really, truthfully, it’s not like hundreds of thousands of dollars of race merchandise is sold just so people just wear it only inside their own homes. It’s not like Strava is a thing just so people can not show others what they did. It’s not like all the social running apps and the posting to facebook and putting your training in public places are so popular because you don’t want recognition.

And, let’s not pretend that “runners” are any one thing. There are some that do it for the love and some that do it for the money and some who do it simply because it’s very, very trendy.

Running has not always been popular. In high school, when I was on the cross-country team, it was painfully unpopular. This is no longer the case. Running is cool now. Running is trendy. It’s very much an ‘in’ thing to do. And there are many, many people who do it because it is The Thing to do. That may not always be the case, but it is the case now. Lots of us feel like this still isn’t true. Lots of us feel like running is still supposed to be something different, something uncool and reflective of a dark need in your soul that you don’t discuss in polite company. We still have the nerdy kid complex, but it’s time to admit we’re actually the prom queen. No one likes the movie star who goes around still insisting they’re a geek.

Running is cool. It didn’t get that way by not being a little bit about showing off. And that means some people aren’t going to like the cool kids. If you aren’t doing it to be cool, if you aren’t doing it to show off, then don’t care.

4 thoughts on “Why the Wall Street Journal ‘Runners Suck’ Op-Ed Might Be a Little Right

  1. Love the “translation” version! And I’m with you on calling bullshit – taking selfies and posting to FB is not the same thing as being self-reflective and philosophical.

Leave a Reply to kellydomara Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s