So Malcolm Gladwell decided to write about doping. And, the problem isn’t that there’s not a debate to be had about what constitutes a natural v. unnatural advantage. The problem is that he so clearly knows so little about that debate.
2 thoughts on “So Malcolm Gladwell decided to write about doping. And, the problem isn’t that there’s not a debate to be had about what constitutes a natural v. unnatural advantage. The problem is that he so clearly knows so little about that debate.”
Best defense of doping I’ve ever read.
It’s an interesting point and one lots of people have made, but a lot of the actual article, like 3/4, is just re-iterating stuff we already knew about how doping works. So, it kind of is a weak article to me?
Best defense of doping I’ve ever read.
It’s an interesting point and one lots of people have made, but a lot of the actual article, like 3/4, is just re-iterating stuff we already knew about how doping works. So, it kind of is a weak article to me?